AWAY · CLASS 4Excelsior Springs12FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5William Chrisman54FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: WILLIAM CHRISMAN BY 7 · PROJECTED EXCELSIOR SPRINGS 23–30 WILLIAM CHRISMAN · 72% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICExcelsior SpringsWilliam Chrisman
Record0-52-3
PF / GAME18.723.7
PA / GAME34.727.7
AVG MARGIN-21.0-10.6
SOS+6.3-0.4
POWER-18.8-10.7
THE RECAP

WILLIAM CHRISMAN WRITES THE FINAL WORD

William Chrisman finished the job, as Excelsior Springs and William Chrisman finished 12-54. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 23-30 final.

The actual margin was 42 points versus MOFO's 6.9-point projection. That produced a 35.1-point margin error, with score errors of 10.8 for Excelsior Springs and 24.3 for William Chrisman.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD WILLIAM CHRISMAN

MOFO leans toward William Chrisman because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 8.1-point power-rating advantage and projects a 6.9-point margin, with William Chrisman carrying a 72% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: William Chrisman enters at 23.7 points per game compared with 18.7 for Excelsior Springs. William Chrisman also allows 7.0 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -0.4 for William Chrisman and +6.3 for Excelsior Springs. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01William Chrisman owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Excelsior Springs has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 8.1-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.