AWAY · 8-MANPrinceton20FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOME · 8-MANStanberry0FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: STANBERRY BY 4 · PROJECTED PRINCETON 34–38 STANBERRY · 62% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICPrincetonStanberry
Record3-25-0
PF / GAME35.753.9
PA / GAME21.331.6
AVG MARGIN+15.7+24.3
SOS+4.6-11.7
POWER+17.3+20.3
THE RECAP

PRINCETON WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Princeton finished the job, as Princeton and Stanberry finished 20-0. MOFO's pick of Stanberry missed; the model had projected a 34-38 final.

The actual margin was 20 points versus MOFO's 3.8-point projection. That produced a 23.8-point margin error, with score errors of 13.7 for Princeton and 37.5 for Stanberry.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD STANBERRY

MOFO leans toward Stanberry because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 3.0-point power-rating advantage and projects a 3.8-point margin, with Stanberry carrying a 62% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Stanberry enters at 53.9 points per game compared with 35.7 for Princeton. Princeton's defensive numbers are competitive, which is the best statistical path to keeping the game tighter than projected.

Strength of schedule checks in at -11.7 for Stanberry and +4.6 for Princeton. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Stanberry owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Princeton has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 3.0-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.