AWAY · CLASS 1Gallatin with Tri-County6FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 1Marceline9FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: GALLATIN WITH TRI-COUNTY BY 3 · PROJECTED GALLATIN WITH TRI-COUNTY 25–22 MARCELINE · 60% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICGallatin with Tri-CountyMarceline
Record2-32-3
PF / GAME21.721.0
PA / GAME23.327.4
AVG MARGIN-2.3-7.2
SOS+0.4+3.2
POWER-2.1-6.0
THE RECAP

MARCELINE WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Marceline finished the job, as Gallatin with Tri-County and Marceline finished 6-9. MOFO's pick of Gallatin with Tri-County missed; the model had projected a 25-22 final.

The actual margin was 3 points versus MOFO's 3.0-point projection. That produced a 6.0-point margin error, with score errors of 18.8 for Gallatin with Tri-County and 12.9 for Marceline.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD GALLATIN WITH TRI-COUNTY

MOFO leans toward Gallatin with Tri-County because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 3.9-point power-rating advantage and projects a 3.0-point margin, with Gallatin with Tri-County carrying a 60% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Gallatin with Tri-County enters at 21.7 points per game compared with 21.0 for Marceline. Gallatin with Tri-County also allows 4.1 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +0.4 for Gallatin with Tri-County and +3.2 for Marceline. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Gallatin with Tri-County owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Marceline has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 3.9-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.