AWAY · CLASS 2East Buchanan40FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 2Lathrop34FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: LATHROP BY 14 · PROJECTED EAST BUCHANAN 20–33 LATHROP · 86% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICEast BuchananLathrop
Record3-25-0
PF / GAME28.332.9
PA / GAME29.415.6
AVG MARGIN-4.7+16.8
SOS+2.4-1.8
POWER-3.8+16.1
THE RECAP

EAST BUCHANAN WRITES THE FINAL WORD

East Buchanan finished the job, as East Buchanan and Lathrop finished 40-34. MOFO's pick of Lathrop missed; the model had projected a 20-33 final.

The actual margin was 6 points versus MOFO's 13.8-point projection. That produced a 19.8-point margin error, with score errors of 20.4 for East Buchanan and 0.6 for Lathrop.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD LATHROP

MOFO leans toward Lathrop because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 20.0-point power-rating advantage and projects a 13.8-point margin, with Lathrop carrying a 86% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Lathrop enters at 32.9 points per game compared with 28.3 for East Buchanan. Lathrop also allows 13.8 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -1.8 for Lathrop and +2.4 for East Buchanan. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains high.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Lathrop owns the stronger scoring profile.

02East Buchanan has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 20.0-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.