AWAY · CLASS 6Lindbergh3FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5Kirkwood27FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: KIRKWOOD BY 14 · PROJECTED LINDBERGH 20–34 KIRKWOOD · 87% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICLindberghKirkwood
Record2-33-1
PF / GAME20.440.3
PA / GAME23.724.7
AVG MARGIN-3.9+20.3
SOS+4.0+1.0
POWER-2.5+20.7
THE RECAP

KIRKWOOD WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Kirkwood finished the job, as Lindbergh and Kirkwood finished 3-27. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 20-34 final.

The actual margin was 24 points versus MOFO's 14.2-point projection. That produced a 9.8-point margin error, with score errors of 17.2 for Lindbergh and 7.4 for Kirkwood.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD KIRKWOOD

MOFO leans toward Kirkwood because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 23.2-point power-rating advantage and projects a 14.2-point margin, with Kirkwood carrying a 87% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Kirkwood enters at 40.3 points per game compared with 20.4 for Lindbergh. Lindbergh's defensive numbers are competitive, which is the best statistical path to keeping the game tighter than projected.

Strength of schedule checks in at +1.0 for Kirkwood and +4.0 for Lindbergh. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Kirkwood owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Lindbergh has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 23.2-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.