TALE OF THE TAPE
| METRIC | Reeds Spring | Fair Grove |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 1-4 | 4-1 |
| PF / GAME | 13.7 | 35.0 |
| PA / GAME | 34.7 | 21.1 |
| AVG MARGIN | -27.4 | +15.4 |
| SOS | -0.1 | +0.8 |
| POWER | -27.5 | +15.7 |
FAIR GROVE WRITES THE FINAL WORD
Fair Grove finished the job, as Reeds Spring and Fair Grove finished 0-56. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 13-40 final.
The actual margin was 56 points versus MOFO's 27.0-point projection. That produced a 29.0-point margin error, with score errors of 12.6 for Reeds Spring and 16.3 for Fair Grove.
THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD FAIR GROVE
MOFO leans toward Fair Grove because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 43.2-point power-rating advantage and projects a 27.0-point margin, with Fair Grove carrying a 95% win probability.
The clearest separator is scoring: Fair Grove enters at 35.0 points per game compared with 13.7 for Reeds Spring. Fair Grove also allows 13.6 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.
Strength of schedule checks in at +0.8 for Fair Grove and -0.1 for Reeds Spring. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains high.
01Fair Grove owns the stronger scoring profile.
02Fair Grove has faced the tougher schedule.
03A 43.2-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.