AWAY · CLASS 3Hollister0FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3Clever41FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: CLEVER BY 27 · PROJECTED HOLLISTER 13–41 CLEVER · 95% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICHollisterClever
Record0-54-1
PF / GAME16.328.6
PA / GAME43.619.7
AVG MARGIN-31.7+12.3
SOS+8.7+2.4
POWER-28.7+13.2
THE RECAP

CLEVER WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Clever finished the job, as Hollister and Clever finished 0-41. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 13-41 final.

The actual margin was 41 points versus MOFO's 27.2-point projection. That produced a 13.8-point margin error, with score errors of 13.5 for Hollister and 0.4 for Clever.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD CLEVER

MOFO leans toward Clever because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 41.9-point power-rating advantage and projects a 27.2-point margin, with Clever carrying a 95% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Clever enters at 28.6 points per game compared with 16.3 for Hollister. Clever also allows 23.9 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +2.4 for Clever and +8.7 for Hollister. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains high.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Clever owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Hollister has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 41.9-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.