AWAY · CLASS 3Ste. Genevieve20FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3Central (Park Hills)7FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: STE. GENEVIEVE BY 18 · PROJECTED STE. GENEVIEVE 35–17 CENTRAL (PARK HILLS) · 92% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICSte. GenevieveCentral (Park Hills)
Record4-12-3
PF / GAME31.319.9
PA / GAME19.033.3
AVG MARGIN+15.6-13.5
SOS-0.3+16.0
POWER+15.5-7.9
THE RECAP

STE. GENEVIEVE WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Ste. Genevieve finished the job, as Ste. Genevieve and Central (Park Hills) finished 20-7. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 35-17 final.

The actual margin was 13 points versus MOFO's 18.0-point projection. That produced a 5.0-point margin error, with score errors of 14.9 for Ste. Genevieve and 9.9 for Central (Park Hills).

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD STE. GENEVIEVE

MOFO leans toward Ste. Genevieve because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 23.3-point power-rating advantage and projects a 18.0-point margin, with Ste. Genevieve carrying a 92% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Ste. Genevieve enters at 31.3 points per game compared with 19.9 for Central (Park Hills). Ste. Genevieve also allows 14.3 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -0.3 for Ste. Genevieve and +16.0 for Central (Park Hills). Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains high.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Ste. Genevieve owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Central (Park Hills) has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 23.3-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.