AWAY · CLASS 5Rockhurst25FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOMEBishop Miege (KS)28FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: ROCKHURST BY 12 · PROJECTED ROCKHURST 31–19 BISHOP MIEGE (KS) · 82% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICRockhurstBishop Miege (KS)
Record2-30-0
PF / GAME24.922.2
PA / GAME22.331.8
AVG MARGIN+4.2-19.2
SOS+8.4+6.0
POWER+7.1-17.1
THE RECAP

BISHOP MIEGE (KS) WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Bishop Miege (KS) finished the job, as Rockhurst and Bishop Miege (KS) finished 25-28. MOFO's pick of Rockhurst missed; the model had projected a 31-19 final.

The actual margin was 3 points versus MOFO's 11.6-point projection. That produced a 14.6-point margin error, with score errors of 6.1 for Rockhurst and 8.5 for Bishop Miege (KS).

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD ROCKHURST

MOFO leans toward Rockhurst because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 24.2-point power-rating advantage and projects a 11.6-point margin, with Rockhurst carrying a 82% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Rockhurst enters at 24.9 points per game compared with 22.2 for Bishop Miege (KS). Rockhurst also allows 9.5 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +8.4 for Rockhurst and +6.0 for Bishop Miege (KS). Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low — no season data.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Rockhurst owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Rockhurst has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 24.2-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.