AWAY · CLASS 5Smith-Cotton39FINAL SCORE
OCT 02VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5Battle0FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: SMITH-COTTON BY 12 · PROJECTED SMITH-COTTON 33–21 BATTLE · 83% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICSmith-CottonBattle
Record1-40-5
PF / GAME23.69.6
PA / GAME36.738.6
AVG MARGIN-17.6-35.0
SOS+7.8+6.8
POWER-14.9-32.6
THE RECAP

SMITH-COTTON WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Smith-Cotton finished the job, as Smith-Cotton and Battle finished 39-0. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 33-21 final.

The actual margin was 39 points versus MOFO's 11.7-point projection. That produced a 27.3-point margin error, with score errors of 6.0 for Smith-Cotton and 21.2 for Battle.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD SMITH-COTTON

MOFO leans toward Smith-Cotton because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 17.7-point power-rating advantage and projects a 11.7-point margin, with Smith-Cotton carrying a 83% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Smith-Cotton enters at 23.6 points per game compared with 9.6 for Battle. Smith-Cotton also allows 1.9 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +7.8 for Smith-Cotton and +6.8 for Battle. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains high.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Smith-Cotton owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Smith-Cotton has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 17.7-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.