AWAY · CLASS 3Fredericktown8FINAL SCORE
SEP 25VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3Ste. Genevieve40FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: STE. GENEVIEVE BY 10 · PROJECTED FREDERICKTOWN 19–29 STE. GENEVIEVE · 79% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICFredericktownSte. Genevieve
Record2-23-1
PF / GAME19.929.9
PA / GAME26.220.9
AVG MARGIN-4.3+7.4
SOS+6.3+4.7
POWER-2.1+9.1
THE RECAP

STE. GENEVIEVE WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Ste. Genevieve finished the job, as Fredericktown and Ste. Genevieve finished 8-40. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 19-29 final.

The actual margin was 32 points versus MOFO's 9.8-point projection. That produced a 22.2-point margin error, with score errors of 11.3 for Fredericktown and 10.9 for Ste. Genevieve.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD STE. GENEVIEVE

MOFO leans toward Ste. Genevieve because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 11.1-point power-rating advantage and projects a 9.8-point margin, with Ste. Genevieve carrying a 79% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Ste. Genevieve enters at 29.9 points per game compared with 19.9 for Fredericktown. Ste. Genevieve also allows 5.3 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +4.7 for Ste. Genevieve and +6.3 for Fredericktown. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Ste. Genevieve owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Fredericktown has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 11.1-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.