AWAY · CLASS 6Hickman48FINAL SCORE
SEP 25VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5Smith-Cotton7FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: HICKMAN BY 13 · PROJECTED HICKMAN 34–21 SMITH-COTTON · 85% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICHickmanSmith-Cotton
Record3-11-3
PF / GAME29.926.4
PA / GAME20.034.9
AVG MARGIN+11.8-12.3
SOS-7.4+5.6
POWER+9.2-10.4
THE RECAP

HICKMAN WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Hickman finished the job, as Hickman and Smith-Cotton finished 48-7. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 34-21 final.

The actual margin was 41 points versus MOFO's 12.8-point projection. That produced a 28.2-point margin error, with score errors of 13.8 for Hickman and 14.4 for Smith-Cotton.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD HICKMAN

MOFO leans toward Hickman because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 19.6-point power-rating advantage and projects a 12.8-point margin, with Hickman carrying a 85% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Hickman enters at 29.9 points per game compared with 26.4 for Smith-Cotton. Hickman also allows 14.9 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -7.4 for Hickman and +5.6 for Smith-Cotton. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Hickman owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Smith-Cotton has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 19.6-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.