AWAY · CLASS 2Forsyth41FINAL SCORE
SEP 25VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3Reeds Spring6FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: FORSYTH BY 9 · PROJECTED FORSYTH 30–21 REEDS SPRING · 76% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICForsythReeds Spring
Record0-41-3
PF / GAME22.415.0
PA / GAME30.433.7
AVG MARGIN-12.7-25.7
SOS+4.0+0.0
POWER-11.3-25.7
THE RECAP

FORSYTH WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Forsyth finished the job, as Forsyth and Reeds Spring finished 41-6. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 30-21 final.

The actual margin was 35 points versus MOFO's 8.8-point projection. That produced a 26.2-point margin error, with score errors of 11.2 for Forsyth and 15.0 for Reeds Spring.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD FORSYTH

MOFO leans toward Forsyth because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 14.4-point power-rating advantage and projects a 8.8-point margin, with Forsyth carrying a 76% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Forsyth enters at 22.4 points per game compared with 15.0 for Reeds Spring. Forsyth also allows 3.3 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +4.0 for Forsyth and +0.0 for Reeds Spring. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Forsyth owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Forsyth has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 14.4-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.