AWAY · CLASS 3Central (Kansas City)26FINAL SCORE
SEP 25VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 4Northeast (Kansas City)13FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: CENTRAL (KANSAS CITY) BY 16 · PROJECTED CENTRAL (KANSAS CITY) 30–14 NORTHEAST (KANSAS CITY) · 89% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICCentral (Kansas City)Northeast (Kansas City)
Record3-10-4
PF / GAME21.215.9
PA / GAME17.234.7
AVG MARGIN+7.5-17.9
SOS-3.7+6.8
POWER+6.2-15.5
THE RECAP

CENTRAL (KANSAS CITY) WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Central (Kansas City) finished the job, as Central (Kansas City) and Northeast (Kansas City) finished 26-13. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 30-14 final.

The actual margin was 13 points versus MOFO's 15.9-point projection. That produced a 2.9-point margin error, with score errors of 4.2 for Central (Kansas City) and 1.3 for Northeast (Kansas City).

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD CENTRAL (KANSAS CITY)

MOFO leans toward Central (Kansas City) because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 21.7-point power-rating advantage and projects a 15.9-point margin, with Central (Kansas City) carrying a 89% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Central (Kansas City) enters at 21.2 points per game compared with 15.9 for Northeast (Kansas City). Central (Kansas City) also allows 17.5 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -3.7 for Central (Kansas City) and +6.8 for Northeast (Kansas City). Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Central (Kansas City) owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Northeast (Kansas City) has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 21.7-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.