TALE OF THE TAPE
| METRIC | Christian Brothers College | Lipscomb Academy (Tenn.) |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 3-1 | 0-0 |
| PF / GAME | 36.4 | 29.0 |
| PA / GAME | 33.4 | 36.0 |
| AVG MARGIN | +6.9 | -20.8 |
| SOS | +14.1 | +14.8 |
| POWER | +11.8 | -15.6 |
LIPSCOMB ACADEMY (TENN.) WRITES THE FINAL WORD
Lipscomb Academy (Tenn.) finished the job, as Christian Brothers College and Lipscomb Academy (Tenn.) finished 34-35. MOFO's pick of Christian Brothers College missed; the model had projected a 39-28 final.
The actual margin was 1 points versus MOFO's 11.4-point projection. That produced a 12.4-point margin error, with score errors of 5.4 for Christian Brothers College and 7.0 for Lipscomb Academy (Tenn.).
THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD CHRISTIAN BROTHERS COLLEGE
MOFO leans toward Christian Brothers College because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 27.4-point power-rating advantage and projects a 11.4-point margin, with Christian Brothers College carrying a 82% win probability.
The clearest separator is scoring: Christian Brothers College enters at 36.4 points per game compared with 29.0 for Lipscomb Academy (Tenn.). Christian Brothers College also allows 2.6 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.
Strength of schedule checks in at +14.1 for Christian Brothers College and +14.8 for Lipscomb Academy (Tenn.). Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low — no season data.
01Christian Brothers College owns the stronger scoring profile.
02Lipscomb Academy (Tenn.) has faced the tougher schedule.
03A 27.4-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.