AWAY · CLASS 3Herculaneum35FINAL SCORE
SEP 25VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3Cuba with Steelville8FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: CUBA WITH STEELVILLE BY 7 · PROJECTED HERCULANEUM 21–28 CUBA WITH STEELVILLE · 71% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICHerculaneumCuba with Steelville
Record1-32-2
PF / GAME20.927.9
PA / GAME26.224.0
AVG MARGIN-12.7+4.5
SOS+1.4-14.7
POWER-12.3-0.6
THE RECAP

HERCULANEUM WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Herculaneum finished the job, as Herculaneum and Cuba with Steelville finished 35-8. MOFO's pick of Cuba with Steelville missed; the model had projected a 21-28 final.

The actual margin was 27 points versus MOFO's 6.9-point projection. That produced a 33.9-point margin error, with score errors of 13.7 for Herculaneum and 20.2 for Cuba with Steelville.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD CUBA WITH STEELVILLE

MOFO leans toward Cuba with Steelville because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 11.6-point power-rating advantage and projects a 6.9-point margin, with Cuba with Steelville carrying a 71% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Cuba with Steelville enters at 27.9 points per game compared with 20.9 for Herculaneum. Cuba with Steelville also allows 2.2 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -14.7 for Cuba with Steelville and +1.4 for Herculaneum. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Cuba with Steelville owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Herculaneum has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 11.6-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.