TALE OF THE TAPE
| METRIC | Hayden Catholic (KS) | St. Pius X (Kansas City) |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 0-0 | 3-0 |
| PF / GAME | 32.5 | 33.0 |
| PA / GAME | 21.9 | 14.4 |
| AVG MARGIN | +22.8 | +25.3 |
| SOS | +4.7 | +2.7 |
| POWER | +24.4 | +26.3 |
ST. PIUS X (KANSAS CITY) WRITES THE FINAL WORD
St. Pius X (Kansas City) finished the job, as Hayden Catholic (KS) and St. Pius X (Kansas City) finished 12-57. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 23-28 final.
The actual margin was 45 points versus MOFO's 4.3-point projection. That produced a 40.7-point margin error, with score errors of 11.2 for Hayden Catholic (KS) and 29.4 for St. Pius X (Kansas City).
THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD ST. PIUS X (KANSAS CITY)
MOFO leans toward St. Pius X (Kansas City) because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 1.9-point power-rating advantage and projects a 4.3-point margin, with St. Pius X (Kansas City) carrying a 64% win probability.
The clearest separator is scoring: St. Pius X (Kansas City) enters at 33.0 points per game compared with 32.5 for Hayden Catholic (KS). St. Pius X (Kansas City) also allows 7.5 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.
Strength of schedule checks in at +2.7 for St. Pius X (Kansas City) and +4.7 for Hayden Catholic (KS). Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low — no season data.
01St. Pius X (Kansas City) owns the stronger scoring profile.
02Hayden Catholic (KS) has faced the tougher schedule.
03A 1.9-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.