AWAY · CLASS 2Willow Springs6FINAL SCORE
SEP 18VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3Mountain Grove55FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: WILLOW SPRINGS BY 1 · PROJECTED WILLOW SPRINGS 25–24 MOUNTAIN GROVE · 55% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICWillow SpringsMountain Grove
Record1-21-2
PF / GAME26.422.8
PA / GAME24.623.2
AVG MARGIN+0.7-0.7
SOS+8.2+8.0
POWER+3.5+2.1
THE RECAP

MOUNTAIN GROVE WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Mountain Grove finished the job, as Willow Springs and Mountain Grove finished 6-55. MOFO's pick of Willow Springs missed; the model had projected a 25-24 final.

The actual margin was 49 points versus MOFO's 1.4-point projection. That produced a 50.4-point margin error, with score errors of 18.9 for Willow Springs and 31.5 for Mountain Grove.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD WILLOW SPRINGS

MOFO leans toward Willow Springs because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 1.4-point power-rating advantage and projects a 1.4-point margin, with Willow Springs carrying a 55% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Willow Springs enters at 26.4 points per game compared with 22.8 for Mountain Grove. Mountain Grove's defensive numbers are competitive, which is the best statistical path to keeping the game tighter than projected.

Strength of schedule checks in at +8.2 for Willow Springs and +8.0 for Mountain Grove. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Willow Springs owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Willow Springs has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 1.4-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.