AWAY · CLASS 1Plattsburg0FINAL SCORE
SEP 18VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 2Mid-Buchanan55FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: MID-BUCHANAN BY 13 · PROJECTED PLATTSBURG 21–35 MID-BUCHANAN · 85% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICPlattsburgMid-Buchanan
Record3-03-0
PF / GAME28.841.4
PA / GAME22.819.0
AVG MARGIN+10.0+32.7
SOS-3.9-3.3
POWER+8.6+31.5
THE RECAP

MID-BUCHANAN WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Mid-Buchanan finished the job, as Plattsburg and Mid-Buchanan finished 0-55. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 21-35 final.

The actual margin was 55 points versus MOFO's 13.3-point projection. That produced a 41.7-point margin error, with score errors of 21.3 for Plattsburg and 20.4 for Mid-Buchanan.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD MID-BUCHANAN

MOFO leans toward Mid-Buchanan because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 22.9-point power-rating advantage and projects a 13.3-point margin, with Mid-Buchanan carrying a 85% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Mid-Buchanan enters at 41.4 points per game compared with 28.8 for Plattsburg. Mid-Buchanan also allows 3.8 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -3.3 for Mid-Buchanan and -3.9 for Plattsburg. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Mid-Buchanan owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Mid-Buchanan has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 22.9-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.