AWAY · CLASS 4Monett54FINAL SCORE
SEP 18VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 4Knob Noster with Leeton8FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: MONETT BY 17 · PROJECTED MONETT 37–20 KNOB NOSTER WITH LEETON · 90% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICMonettKnob Noster with Leeton
Record1-20-3
PF / GAME26.215.2
PA / GAME32.241.2
AVG MARGIN-10.0-35.0
SOS+9.0-1.3
POWER-6.8-35.5
THE RECAP

MONETT WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Monett finished the job, as Monett and Knob Noster with Leeton finished 54-8. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 37-20 final.

The actual margin was 46 points versus MOFO's 16.7-point projection. That produced a 29.3-point margin error, with score errors of 17.0 for Monett and 12.3 for Knob Noster with Leeton.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD MONETT

MOFO leans toward Monett because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 28.6-point power-rating advantage and projects a 16.7-point margin, with Monett carrying a 90% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Monett enters at 26.2 points per game compared with 15.2 for Knob Noster with Leeton. Monett also allows 9.0 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +9.0 for Monett and -1.3 for Knob Noster with Leeton. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains medium.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Monett owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Monett has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 28.6-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.