AWAY · CLASS 6Marquette21FINAL SCORE
SEP 18VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5Kirkwood52FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: KIRKWOOD BY 11 · PROJECTED MARQUETTE 23–34 KIRKWOOD · 81% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICMarquetteKirkwood
Record2-02-0
PF / GAME27.040.6
PA / GAME23.922.4
AVG MARGIN+10.2+28.4
SOS+0.8-7.5
POWER+10.5+25.8
THE RECAP

KIRKWOOD WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Kirkwood finished the job, as Marquette and Kirkwood finished 21-52. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 23-34 final.

The actual margin was 31 points versus MOFO's 10.7-point projection. That produced a 20.3-point margin error, with score errors of 2.1 for Marquette and 18.2 for Kirkwood.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD KIRKWOOD

MOFO leans toward Kirkwood because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 15.2-point power-rating advantage and projects a 10.7-point margin, with Kirkwood carrying a 81% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Kirkwood enters at 40.6 points per game compared with 27.0 for Marquette. Kirkwood also allows 1.5 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -7.5 for Kirkwood and +0.8 for Marquette. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Kirkwood owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Marquette has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 15.2-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.