AWAY · CLASS 2Mark Twain6FINAL SCORE
SEP 11VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3Winfield14FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: WINFIELD BY 13 · PROJECTED MARK TWAIN 20–32 WINFIELD · 84% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICMark TwainWinfield
Record1-11-1
PF / GAME18.928.4
PA / GAME31.125.2
AVG MARGIN-13.6+7.8
SOS-5.1-3.5
POWER-15.4+6.5
THE RECAP

WINFIELD WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Winfield finished the job, as Mark Twain and Winfield finished 6-14. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 20-32 final.

The actual margin was 8 points versus MOFO's 12.6-point projection. That produced a 4.6-point margin error, with score errors of 13.6 for Mark Twain and 18.2 for Winfield.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD WINFIELD

MOFO leans toward Winfield because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 21.9-point power-rating advantage and projects a 12.6-point margin, with Winfield carrying a 84% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Winfield enters at 28.4 points per game compared with 18.9 for Mark Twain. Winfield also allows 5.9 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -3.5 for Winfield and -5.1 for Mark Twain. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Winfield owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Winfield has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 21.9-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.