AWAY · CLASS 4Hannibal6FINAL SCORE
SEP 11VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 6Troy Buchanan35FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: TROY BUCHANAN BY 5 · PROJECTED HANNIBAL 27–31 TROY BUCHANAN · 65% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICHannibalTroy Buchanan
Record1-11-1
PF / GAME30.333.1
PA / GAME27.924.8
AVG MARGIN-1.3+11.7
SOS+8.1-3.1
POWER+1.6+10.6
THE RECAP

TROY BUCHANAN WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Troy Buchanan finished the job, as Hannibal and Troy Buchanan finished 6-35. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 27-31 final.

The actual margin was 29 points versus MOFO's 4.6-point projection. That produced a 24.4-point margin error, with score errors of 20.7 for Hannibal and 3.7 for Troy Buchanan.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD TROY BUCHANAN

MOFO leans toward Troy Buchanan because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 9.1-point power-rating advantage and projects a 4.6-point margin, with Troy Buchanan carrying a 65% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Troy Buchanan enters at 33.1 points per game compared with 30.3 for Hannibal. Troy Buchanan also allows 3.1 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -3.1 for Troy Buchanan and +8.1 for Hannibal. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Troy Buchanan owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Hannibal has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 9.1-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.