AWAY · CLASS 5Cardinal Ritter22FINAL SCORE
SEP 11VSFINAL
HOMEKnoxville Catholic (TN)28FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: CARDINAL RITTER BY 5 · PROJECTED CARDINAL RITTER 31–27 KNOXVILLE CATHOLIC (TN) · 65% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICCardinal RitterKnoxville Catholic (TN)
Record1-10-0
PF / GAME33.527.5
PA / GAME27.727.5
AVG MARGIN+7.5+0.0
SOS+0.3+0.0
POWER+7.6+0.0
THE RECAP

KNOXVILLE CATHOLIC (TN) WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Knoxville Catholic (TN) finished the job, as Cardinal Ritter and Knoxville Catholic (TN) finished 22-28. MOFO's pick of Cardinal Ritter missed; the model had projected a 31-27 final.

The actual margin was 6 points versus MOFO's 4.6-point projection. That produced a 10.6-point margin error, with score errors of 9.3 for Cardinal Ritter and 1.2 for Knoxville Catholic (TN).

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD CARDINAL RITTER

MOFO leans toward Cardinal Ritter because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 7.6-point power-rating advantage and projects a 4.6-point margin, with Cardinal Ritter carrying a 65% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Cardinal Ritter enters at 33.5 points per game compared with 27.5 for Knoxville Catholic (TN). Knoxville Catholic (TN)'s defensive numbers are competitive, which is the best statistical path to keeping the game tighter than projected.

Strength of schedule checks in at +0.3 for Cardinal Ritter and +0.0 for Knoxville Catholic (TN). Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low — no season data.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Cardinal Ritter owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Cardinal Ritter has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 7.6-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.