AWAY · CLASS 4Orchard Farm28FINAL SCORE
SEP 10VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5Ft. Zumwalt East33FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: ORCHARD FARM BY 7 · PROJECTED ORCHARD FARM 31–25 FT. ZUMWALT EAST · 71% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICOrchard FarmFt. Zumwalt East
Record2-01-1
PF / GAME33.029.6
PA / GAME21.327.9
AVG MARGIN+16.9+2.5
SOS-14.3-1.1
POWER+11.9+2.2
THE RECAP

FT. ZUMWALT EAST WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Ft. Zumwalt East finished the job, as Orchard Farm and Ft. Zumwalt East finished 28-33. MOFO's pick of Orchard Farm missed; the model had projected a 31-25 final.

The actual margin was 5 points versus MOFO's 6.7-point projection. That produced a 11.7-point margin error, with score errors of 3.3 for Orchard Farm and 8.4 for Ft. Zumwalt East.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

FT. ZUMWALT EAST'S UNDERDOG PATH

Ft. Zumwalt East, the underdog, faces a Class 5 opponent in Orchard Farm, where the favorite, Orchard Farm, holds a 11.9 power gap. Despite a 2-0 record, the underdog's 1-1 record and 29.6 passing efficiency suggest a plausible path. The home field application is neutral, but the projected margin of 6.7 favors the favorite. Sample-size confidence is low, yet the underdog's 27.9 passing attack and 29.6 passing efficiency offer a fighting chance. The game is a tight battle, with Orchard Farm's 21.3 passing attack and 33.0 passing efficiency giving them a slight edge.

conclusion_summary":

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · QWEN3:1.7B
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Orchard Farm owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Ft. Zumwalt East has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 9.8-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.