AWAY · CLASS 5Smith-Cotton18FINAL SCORE
SEP 11VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5Camdenton55FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: CAMDENTON BY 8 · PROJECTED SMITH-COTTON 27–35 CAMDENTON · 75% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICSmith-CottonCamdenton
Record0-22-0
PF / GAME23.537.7
PA / GAME28.933.6
AVG MARGIN-9.0+11.0
SOS+4.5-4.4
POWER-7.4+9.5
THE RECAP

CAMDENTON WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Camdenton finished the job, as Smith-Cotton and Camdenton finished 18-55. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 27-35 final.

The actual margin was 37 points versus MOFO's 8.1-point projection. That produced a 28.9-point margin error, with score errors of 8.9 for Smith-Cotton and 20.0 for Camdenton.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD CAMDENTON

MOFO leans toward Camdenton because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 17.0-point power-rating advantage and projects a 8.1-point margin, with Camdenton carrying a 75% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Camdenton enters at 37.7 points per game compared with 23.5 for Smith-Cotton. Smith-Cotton's defensive numbers are competitive, which is the best statistical path to keeping the game tighter than projected.

Strength of schedule checks in at -4.4 for Camdenton and +4.5 for Smith-Cotton. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Camdenton owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Smith-Cotton has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 17.0-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.