AWAY · CLASS 3Hallsville55FINAL SCORE
SEP 11VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3California26FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: CALIFORNIA BY 1 · PROJECTED HALLSVILLE 27–28 CALIFORNIA · 53% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICHallsvilleCalifornia
Record1-11-1
PF / GAME25.422.7
PA / GAME31.528.9
AVG MARGIN-8.9-6.7
SOS+9.3+12.0
POWER-5.7-2.5
THE RECAP

HALLSVILLE WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Hallsville finished the job, as Hallsville and California finished 55-26. MOFO's pick of California missed; the model had projected a 27-28 final.

The actual margin was 29 points versus MOFO's 0.8-point projection. That produced a 29.8-point margin error, with score errors of 28.2 for Hallsville and 1.5 for California.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD CALIFORNIA

MOFO leans toward California because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 3.2-point power-rating advantage and projects a 0.8-point margin, with California carrying a 53% win probability.

Hallsville actually owns the stronger raw scoring average, so this pick is driven more by opponent adjustment and the complete power profile than offense alone. California also allows 2.6 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +12.0 for California and +9.3 for Hallsville. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Hallsville owns the stronger scoring profile.

02California has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 3.2-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.