AWAY · CLASS 6Rock Bridge31FINAL SCORE
SEP 04VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5Smith-Cotton21FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: ROCK BRIDGE BY 6 · PROJECTED ROCK BRIDGE 28–22 SMITH-COTTON · 70% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICRock BridgeSmith-Cotton
Record0-10-1
PF / GAME27.223.0
PA / GAME22.627.6
AVG MARGIN-0.1-7.8
SOS+3.1+3.9
POWER+1.0-6.5
THE RECAP

ROCK BRIDGE WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Rock Bridge finished the job, as Rock Bridge and Smith-Cotton finished 31-21. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 28-22 final.

The actual margin was 10 points versus MOFO's 6.2-point projection. That produced a 3.8-point margin error, with score errors of 2.8 for Rock Bridge and 1.0 for Smith-Cotton.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD ROCK BRIDGE

MOFO leans toward Rock Bridge because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 7.5-point power-rating advantage and projects a 6.2-point margin, with Rock Bridge carrying a 70% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Rock Bridge enters at 27.2 points per game compared with 23.0 for Smith-Cotton. Rock Bridge also allows 5.0 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at +3.1 for Rock Bridge and +3.9 for Smith-Cotton. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Rock Bridge owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Smith-Cotton has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 7.5-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.