AWAY · CLASS 5North Point35FINAL SCORE
SEP 04VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 6Seckman71FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: SECKMAN BY 7 · PROJECTED NORTH POINT 23–30 SECKMAN · 71% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICNorth PointSeckman
Record0-11-0
PF / GAME28.831.1
PA / GAME25.920.3
AVG MARGIN+2.1+18.2
SOS-0.8-9.7
POWER+1.8+14.8
THE RECAP

SECKMAN WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Seckman finished the job, as North Point and Seckman finished 35-71. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 23-30 final.

The actual margin was 36 points versus MOFO's 6.5-point projection. That produced a 29.5-point margin error, with score errors of 11.7 for North Point and 41.2 for Seckman.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD SECKMAN

MOFO leans toward Seckman because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 12.9-point power-rating advantage and projects a 6.5-point margin, with Seckman carrying a 71% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Seckman enters at 31.1 points per game compared with 28.8 for North Point. Seckman also allows 5.6 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -9.7 for Seckman and -0.8 for North Point. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Seckman owns the stronger scoring profile.

02North Point has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 12.9-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.