AWAY · CLASS 6Ritenour35FINAL SCORE
SEP 04VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 4Jennings0FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: JENNINGS BY 9 · PROJECTED RITENOUR 22–31 JENNINGS · 78% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICRitenourJennings
Record0-11-0
PF / GAME27.328.9
PA / GAME30.418.9
AVG MARGIN-15.8+7.4
SOS+12.1-8.4
POWER-11.5+4.5
THE RECAP

RITENOUR WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Ritenour finished the job, as Ritenour and Jennings finished 35-0. MOFO's pick of Jennings missed; the model had projected a 22-31 final.

The actual margin was 35 points versus MOFO's 9.3-point projection. That produced a 44.3-point margin error, with score errors of 13.3 for Ritenour and 31.0 for Jennings.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD JENNINGS

MOFO leans toward Jennings because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 16.0-point power-rating advantage and projects a 9.3-point margin, with Jennings carrying a 78% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Jennings enters at 28.9 points per game compared with 27.3 for Ritenour. Jennings also allows 11.5 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -8.4 for Jennings and +12.1 for Ritenour. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Jennings owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Ritenour has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 16.0-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.