AWAY · CLASS 5Hillcrest20FINAL SCORE
SEP 04VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 2Fair Grove52FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: FAIR GROVE BY 15 · PROJECTED HILLCREST 18–33 FAIR GROVE · 89% WIN · MOFO NAILED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICHillcrestFair Grove
Record0-01-0
PF / GAME16.327.8
PA / GAME33.423.9
AVG MARGIN-17.5+7.4
SOS+0.8-4.3
POWER-17.2+5.9
THE RECAP

FAIR GROVE WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Fair Grove finished the job, as Hillcrest and Fair Grove finished 20-52. MOFO got the winner right; the model had projected a 18-33 final.

The actual margin was 32 points versus MOFO's 15.4-point projection. That produced a 16.6-point margin error, with score errors of 2.3 for Hillcrest and 18.9 for Fair Grove.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD FAIR GROVE

MOFO leans toward Fair Grove because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 23.1-point power-rating advantage and projects a 15.4-point margin, with Fair Grove carrying a 89% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Fair Grove enters at 27.8 points per game compared with 16.3 for Hillcrest. Fair Grove also allows 9.5 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -4.3 for Fair Grove and +0.8 for Hillcrest. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses preseason prior, the confidence remains low — preseason swag.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Fair Grove owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Hillcrest has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 23.1-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.