AWAY · CLASS 2Stockton with Sheldon7FINAL SCORE
SEP 04VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 3Clever28FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: STOCKTON WITH SHELDON BY 2 · PROJECTED STOCKTON WITH SHELDON 25–23 CLEVER · 57% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICStockton with SheldonClever
Record1-01-0
PF / GAME29.925.3
PA / GAME22.619.0
AVG MARGIN+20.6+8.1
SOS-14.7-4.7
POWER+15.5+6.5
THE RECAP

CLEVER WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Clever finished the job, as Stockton with Sheldon and Clever finished 7-28. MOFO's pick of Stockton with Sheldon missed; the model had projected a 25-23 final.

The actual margin was 21 points versus MOFO's 2.1-point projection. That produced a 23.1-point margin error, with score errors of 18.3 for Stockton with Sheldon and 4.9 for Clever.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD STOCKTON WITH SHELDON

MOFO leans toward Stockton with Sheldon because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 9.0-point power-rating advantage and projects a 2.1-point margin, with Stockton with Sheldon carrying a 57% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Stockton with Sheldon enters at 29.9 points per game compared with 25.3 for Clever. Clever's defensive numbers are competitive, which is the best statistical path to keeping the game tighter than projected.

Strength of schedule checks in at -14.7 for Stockton with Sheldon and -4.7 for Clever. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Stockton with Sheldon owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Clever has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 9.0-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.