AWAY · CLASS 6Raymore-Peculiar35FINAL SCORE
SEP 04VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 6Blue Springs32FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: BLUE SPRINGS BY 6 · PROJECTED RAYMORE-PECULIAR 21–26 BLUE SPRINGS · 68% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICRaymore-PeculiarBlue Springs
Record1-01-0
PF / GAME22.428.3
PA / GAME22.720.7
AVG MARGIN+11.2+18.1
SOS-11.0-8.5
POWER+7.3+15.1
THE RECAP

RAYMORE-PECULIAR WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Raymore-Peculiar finished the job, as Raymore-Peculiar and Blue Springs finished 35-32. MOFO's pick of Blue Springs missed; the model had projected a 21-26 final.

The actual margin was 3 points versus MOFO's 5.7-point projection. That produced a 8.7-point margin error, with score errors of 14.3 for Raymore-Peculiar and 5.6 for Blue Springs.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD BLUE SPRINGS

MOFO leans toward Blue Springs because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 7.7-point power-rating advantage and projects a 5.7-point margin, with Blue Springs carrying a 68% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Blue Springs enters at 28.3 points per game compared with 22.4 for Raymore-Peculiar. Blue Springs also allows 2.0 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -8.5 for Blue Springs and -11.0 for Raymore-Peculiar. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses current-season results, the confidence remains low.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Blue Springs owns the stronger scoring profile.

02Blue Springs has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 7.7-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.