AWAY · 8-MANStanberry88FINAL SCORE
AUG 28VSFINAL
HOME · 8-MANSouth Holt70FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: SOUTH HOLT BY 9 · PROJECTED STANBERRY 29–38 SOUTH HOLT · 77% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICStanberrySouth Holt
Record0-00-0
PF / GAME26.727.1
PA / GAME46.633.5
AVG MARGIN-17.0-6.4
SOS-0.9-0.8
POWER-17.3-6.6
THE RECAP

STANBERRY WRITES THE FINAL WORD

Stanberry finished the job, as Stanberry and South Holt finished 88-70. MOFO's pick of South Holt missed; the model had projected a 29-38 final.

The actual margin was 18 points versus MOFO's 9.1-point projection. That produced a 27.1-point margin error, with score errors of 59.1 for Stanberry and 32.0 for South Holt.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD SOUTH HOLT

MOFO leans toward South Holt because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 10.7-point power-rating advantage and projects a 9.1-point margin, with South Holt carrying a 77% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: South Holt enters at 27.1 points per game compared with 26.7 for Stanberry. South Holt also allows 13.1 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -0.8 for South Holt and -0.9 for Stanberry. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses preseason prior, the confidence remains low — preseason swag.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01South Holt owns the stronger scoring profile.

02South Holt has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 10.7-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.