TALE OF THE TAPE
| METRIC | Polo | Schuyler County |
|---|---|---|
| Record | 0-0 | 0-0 |
| PF / GAME | 23.7 | 22.4 |
| PA / GAME | 27.9 | 42.1 |
| AVG MARGIN | -4.7 | -16.1 |
| SOS | -2.2 | -0.9 |
| POWER | -5.4 | -16.4 |
SCHUYLER COUNTY WRITES THE FINAL WORD
Schuyler County finished the job, as Polo and Schuyler County finished 50-58. MOFO's pick of Polo missed; the model had projected a 34-24 final.
The actual margin was 8 points versus MOFO's 10.2-point projection. That produced a 18.2-point margin error, with score errors of 15.9 for Polo and 34.1 for Schuyler County.
THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD POLO
MOFO leans toward Polo because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 11.0-point power-rating advantage and projects a 10.2-point margin, with Polo carrying a 79% win probability.
The clearest separator is scoring: Polo enters at 23.7 points per game compared with 22.4 for Schuyler County. Polo also allows 14.2 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.
Strength of schedule checks in at -2.2 for Polo and -0.9 for Schuyler County. Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses preseason prior, the confidence remains low — preseason swag.
01Polo owns the stronger scoring profile.
02Schuyler County has faced the tougher schedule.
03A 11.0-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.