AWAY · CLASS 5St. Pius X (Kansas City)23FINAL SCORE
AUG 28VSFINAL
HOME · CLASS 5Rockhurst17FINAL SCORE
MOFO PREDICTION: ROCKHURST BY 6 · PROJECTED ST. PIUS X (KANSAS CITY) 22–28 ROCKHURST · 69% WIN · MOFO MISSED IT

TALE OF THE TAPE

METRICSt. Pius X (Kansas City)Rockhurst
Record0-00-0
PF / GAME26.428.8
PA / GAME26.119.9
AVG MARGIN+0.5+10.6
SOS+3.1-0.7
POWER+1.6+10.4
THE RECAP

ST. PIUS X (KANSAS CITY) WRITES THE FINAL WORD

St. Pius X (Kansas City) finished the job, as St. Pius X (Kansas City) and Rockhurst finished 23-17. MOFO's pick of Rockhurst missed; the model had projected a 22-28 final.

The actual margin was 6 points versus MOFO's 6.0-point projection. That produced a 12.0-point margin error, with score errors of 0.7 for St. Pius X (Kansas City) and 11.3 for Rockhurst.

GENERATED FROM FINAL SCORE + MOFO'S PREGAME SNAPSHOT · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
THE READ

THE NUMBERS POINT TOWARD ROCKHURST

MOFO leans toward Rockhurst because the overall profile points in that direction. The model sees a 8.8-point power-rating advantage and projects a 6.0-point margin, with Rockhurst carrying a 69% win probability.

The clearest separator is scoring: Rockhurst enters at 28.8 points per game compared with 26.4 for St. Pius X (Kansas City). Rockhurst also allows 6.2 fewer points per game, giving MOFO an edge on both sides of the ball.

Strength of schedule checks in at -0.7 for Rockhurst and +3.1 for St. Pius X (Kansas City). Venue order is unverified, so no home-field advantage was applied. Because this read uses preseason prior, the confidence remains low — preseason swag.

GENERATED FROM MOFO MODEL STATISTICS · MOFO DETERMINISTIC
WHAT SWINGS IT

01Rockhurst owns the stronger scoring profile.

02St. Pius X (Kansas City) has faced the tougher schedule.

03A 8.8-point power-rating gap and no home-field adjustment because venue order is unverified shape the final call.